'As an aside, Mr Tony Hogg is totally wrong is quoting a reply put out by Mr. Sean Manchester himself (albeit under yet another one of his multiple aliases') to the effect that he (Mr. Manchester) never made this claim, but that it had been made by others about him'! Pure and utter bulldust!' David, how exactly can I be 'wrong', if I clearly said I saying what he'd told me? Pay attention. 'Mr. Hogg can not really be blamed for being duped by Mr. Manchester's third party claim as he was unaware of its true source of origin i.e. that in reality, this claim was being circulated my Mr. Manchester himself writing under just another false alias. He only has to check with Ms. Dangerfield himself for confirmation of this fact. Though I doubt if he will. It seems Mr Hogg is happier just believing fiction! See you soon, David (Farrant).' Quoting someone is not being 'duped', David. Quoting is...quoting. All I said was that I'd asked Manchester about the claim and related what he said. It wasn't even from him writing as an alias - it was featured on his blog, 'Ask Bishop Sean Manchester'. I even established there was no evidence for the claim, as no DNA testing had been done. Looks like you got a little so caught up in trying to discredit me, that you didn't think your response through. I'm still waiting for you to relate the so-called 'untrue propaganda' I spread about the Highgate case. You said it, now prove it. Otherwise, I'll have to conclude you're as full of bileful hot air as Vampy is.
'As an aside, Mr Tony Hogg is totally wrong is quoting a reply put out by Mr. Sean Manchester himself (albeit under yet another one of his multiple aliases') to the effect that he (Mr. Manchester) never made this claim, but that it had been made by others about him'! Pure and utter bulldust!' David, how exactly can I be 'wrong', if I clearly said I saying what he'd told me? Pay attention. 'Mr. Hogg can not really be blamed for being duped by Mr. Manchester's third party claim as he was unaware of its true source of origin i.e. that in reality, this claim was being circulated my Mr. Manchester himself writing under just another false alias. He only has to check with Ms. Dangerfield himself for confirmation of this fact. Though I doubt if he will. It seems Mr Hogg is happier just believing fiction! See you soon, David (Farrant).' Quoting someone is not being 'duped', David. Quoting is...quoting. All I said was that I'd asked Manchester about the claim and related what he said. It wasn't even from him writing as an alias - it was featured on his blog, 'Ask Bishop Sean Manchester'. I even established there was no evidence for the claim, as no DNA testing had been done. Looks like you got a little so caught up in trying to discredit me, that you didn't think your response through. I'm still waiting for you to relate the so-called 'untrue propaganda' I spread about the Highgate case. You said it, now prove it. Otherwise, I'll have to conclude you're as full of bileful hot air as Vampy is.